Is $10 Million Too Much to See a Mammoth Walk Again?
December 4th, 2008

It’s been a while since I blogged about some cool DNA/evolution stuff, and some new shit has come to light… man. Back in the summer we got news of a (near) perfectly preserved baby mammoth that lived 37,000 years ago discovered by the son of a reindeer farmer back in May 2007. What if it could walk and breathe again?
The mammoth: An ancient member of the elephant family with enormous curved tusks that went extinct about four and a half millenia ago. Well, nowadays the term “extinct” is challenged by scientists as something that no longer represents the ENDING of a creature’s time to reign, but as a challenge to reverse engineer species back into existence!
An article on the Science Daily website (Nov 20, 2008) unloaded some goody-goods on me concerning a team of scientists at Penn State are the first to report the genome-wide sequence of an extinct animal… you guessed it–that of the mighty woolly mammoth!
I did some digging on this story and it starts way back in 2005. Initial funding for this study was provided by McMaster University, The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Penn State University. The project also involved paleontologists from the American Museum of Natural History (USA) and researchers from Russia, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany. [Source]
During this first go-at-it the team’s research was based on 28,000 year old bones that were exceptionally well-preserved in Siberian permafrost. They were able extract about 50% of the mammoth’s DNA from its jaw bone and then compared it to the modern African elephant.
Jumping to June 2008, a new hypothesis came from the team: One suggesting that the mammoth had split into two separate groups about one million years ago. Studies before this research had analyzed only short segments of the DNA of extinct species, this new study generated and compared 18 complete genomes of the extinct woolly mammoth.
This achievement is based on an earlier discovery by the same team in 2006 that revealed ancient DNA survives much better in hair than in any other tissue investigated so far. This discovery makes hair a more powerful and efficient source of DNA for studying the genome sequences of extinct animals. [Source]
Moving on along to the most recent news out of this determined team! They sequenced four billion DNA bases (the size of the modern-day African elephant’s genome) using next-generation DNA-sequencing instruments and a novel approach that reads ancient DNA highly efficiently. The team used a draft version of the African elephant’s genome, which currently is being generated by scientists at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. The issue that remains now is clearing out the DNA that could belongs to other organisms, like bacteria and fungi, from the surrounding environment that had contaminated the sample. Only 3.3 billion are currently assigned to the mammoth genome.
Only after the genome of the African elephant has been completed will we be able to make a final assessment about how much of the full woolly-mammoth genome we have sequenced. — Webb Miller, Penn State professor of biology and of computer science and engineering, one of the project leaders. [Source]
The studies going on here have more to do about learning what possible diseases might have pushed along the mammoth’s extinction then to actually build the tools to bring one back. It’d be pure deception to believe that the future possibilities AREN’T there. This topic has come up with the much more recently extinct Tasmanian tiger, and much like Alfred Hitchcock’s Ninja Cat, slowly but surely, it’ll be right in your face.
By deciphering this genome we could, in theory, generate data that one day may help other researchers to bring the woolly mammoth back to life by inserting the uniquely mammoth DNA sequences into the genome of the modern-day elephant. This would allow scientists to retrieve the genetic information that was believed to have been lost when the mammoth died out, as well as to bring back an extinct species that modern humans have missed meeting by only a few thousand years. — Stephan C. Schuster, Penn State professor of biochemistry and molecular biology and the project’s other leader. [Source]
Biologists could reconstruct an extinct species by figuring out the exact DNA differences between it and its closest living relatives. The cell could be converted into an embryo and brought to term by an elephant, a project he estimated would cost some $10 million. [right hand pinkie to the corner of my right lip!]
There are talks on how to modify the DNA in an elephant’s egg so that after each round of changes it would progressively resemble the DNA in a mammoth egg. The final-stage egg could then be brought to term in an elephant mother, and mammoths might once again roam the Siberian steppes. [Source]
If this process is confirmed to work it could theoretically be used to bring back the Neanderthals–except the moral and ethical implications would be another Humpty Dumpty wall to climb over.
A list of possible holdups in the process of awesomeness and this teams ability to at least TRY and side-wind them [Source]:
- Ancient DNA is always shredded into tiny pieces, seemingly impossible to analyze; a new generation of DNA decoding machines use tiny pieces as their starting point–his team has two.
- ancient DNA in bone, the usual source, is heavily contaminated with bacterial DNA; this team has discovered that hair is a much purer source of the host’s DNA, with the keratin serving to seal it in and largely exclude bacteria.
- the DNA of living cells can be modified only very laboriously and usually at one site at a time; this team is in discussion with George Church, a well-known genome technologist at Harvard Medical School, about a new method Dr. Church has invented for modifying some 50,000 genomic sites at a time.

My final thoughts are actually a reaction to quotes by “leading scientists” concerning the possibility of spending $10 million dollars to try to resurrect the woolly mammoth.
This is as close as we’ve got to the complete genome - the blueprint - for an extinct animal. If you’d told me a few years ago that we would already be this far, I would have laughed at you. [The money would be better spent on keeping living animals safe from extinction.] — Ian Barnes from Royal Holloway, University of London, UK [Source]
We currently don’t have the right tools - such as plasmids to deliver the genes - to make any genetic changes within elephants, let alone make the many accurate variations you would need to reconstruct the mammoth. This is a very distant dream. — Michael Hofreiter from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany [Source]
A wishful-thinking experiment with no realistic chance for success. — Rudolph Jaenisch, a biologist at the Whitehead Institute in Cambridge
Really?! I find it absurd to think it isn’t worth $10 million to once again look in wonder at, not only a millennia extinct creature, but marvel at the possibility of the human’s tenacity to overcome “impossibilities”. The modern automobile, planes, the atomic bomb, Tom Cruise, the phone, the internet, LANDING ON FRIGGIN MARS!!! All these things were thought impossible at one time or another, no? yes? OF COURSE! But they still happened didn’t they?
They happened because humans decided that it was their right to screw with things and PROVE that they CAN!
Ten million… pft… that’s how much Paris Hilton probably makes a year on royalties from her green tinted sex tape videos…
















